why Florida House Bill 1613 Sucks

UPDATE: VETOED Urgent: Push the Florida House to abandon HB 1613!

******UPDATE******

After passing through both chambers of Florida's Legislature, this measure was VETOED by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis.  This was a huge win for the THOUSANDS of small business owners throughout the state that thrive in this industry.  

We support a full, federal legalization of cannabis.  In all forms.  Unfortunately, many in the MMJ/rec community turn a high nose up to these hemp derivatives.  They are definitely not for everyone, but they are great for those who want it.  This bill would have imposed yet more laws prohibiting use of the cannabis plant - additional laws are rarely good for freedom and kindness.

We typically don't support anything that comes out of Ron DeSantis' mouth regarding cannabis.  And don't let this move fool you... Ron is still a wolf in sheep's clothing here.  His stated reason for vetoing this bill is to garner support from the hemp industry against FL Amendment 3 going to ballot this November.  DO NOT FALL FOR IT.  Amendment 3 is imperfect - for sure - but it is still an open door to legal adult use.  His attempt to weaponize the hemp crowd against the adult use crowd will hopefully prove to be as laughable as it sounds come Election Day.

 

Florida's proposed House Bill 1613 aims to overregulate the burgeoning hemp industry, raising concerns about potential impacts on its development and consumer safety. While the bill's intention to protect consumers is commendable, its approach hinders, rather than fosters, responsible industry growth.  As currently proposed, it falls woefully short of its stated goals.

One key concern is the proposed 2% THC limit, stricter than national standards and raising questions about its alignment with scientific evidence. Opponents argue it may exclude beneficial products and hinder research while lacking a strong scientific basis. Proponents emphasize potential abuse risks and the need for consumer safety. Finding a balanced limit, informed by scientific research and industry expertise, is crucial.

Similarly, the bill's broad product bans based on potential appeal to children raise concerns about stifling innovation and unfairly targeting responsible businesses already complying with child safety laws. Striking a balance between protecting children and allowing responsible product development is essential. Open dialogue with stakeholders can help craft regulations that achieve both objectives effectively.  


The proposed event restrictions and vetting requirements deserve specific attention. While ensuring the safety and security of hemp-related events is paramount, overly stringent measures could have unintended consequences. Opponents argue that complex permitting processes, extensive paperwork, and lengthy vetting procedures for organizers and participants could create a bureaucratic nightmare. This could discourage event organizers and vendors, leading to fewer opportunities for community engagement, education, and product exposure. Additionally, it could force organizers to operate underground, potentially increasing safety risks rather than mitigating them.  In our industry we are particularly aware of the fact that OVERREGULATION FUELS THE BLACK MARKET.

Proponents argue that stringent regulations are necessary to prevent potential safety hazards and ensure responsible practices. However, it's crucial to find a balance that effectively addresses these concerns without stifling industry growth and community engagement. Alternative approaches could include collaborating with industry stakeholders to develop clear safety guidelines, implementing risk-based permitting systems, and focusing on educating organizers about responsible event management practices.

Finding a middle ground is key. This bill is not a middle ground.  Streamlining permitting processes, providing clear and accessible guidance for event organizers, and focusing on collaboration with the industry can help ensure the safety of hemp-related events without creating unnecessary burdens. Remember, a vibrant and engaged community plays a crucial role in fostering responsible practices and promoting consumer education.  We can all use our voice to oppose this bill!

Are you in Florida?  Email or call your state representative and let them know how much this bill sucks.  Outside of Florida?  Share these posts, still email any of our reps, and overall continue to be a great advocate for our mission - A Stoned Earth

Back to blog